Globalization
allows the national economies to integrate into international economies,
bringing a lot benefits (Najam, Runnalls and Halle, 2007).
However, one serious problem that has been caused by globalization is the
global environmental damage such as global warming and climate change. The
situation is deteriorated compared to early in this century, especially in
developing countries and big countries. Having seen the severity of the
problem, solutions are required which are mainly governments’ regulation and
civilians’ effort in everyday life.
Globalization
involves a huge number of worldwide activities. In order to sustain massive
production, all types of resources are used rapidly; in the cause of exportation
through various ways of transportation, crude oil is highly demanded. In the
fast-paced world, air transportation is considered firstly. According to the
data in “Facts of Flying” of Grist Magazine, by
Todd Hettenbach, ten gallons
of crude oil is required to make only one gallon of jet fuel which is used in
aircraft. There are nearly hundred thousand flights each day. Jet fuel creates
a large amount of wastewater and carbon dioxide gas to the environment. Irresponsible
corporations also create damage to environment. Their negligent and reckless
behavior and cut-back measures have caused environmental mishaps. For example,
the cost-cutting by British Petroleum on maintenance is believed to be
responsible for the oil well explosion. In addition, profit motives prevent
companies from reducing industrial activities. Some developing countries, like
China and Vietnam, export their agricultural goods, and consequently their
pollutive methods in clearing land and slash and burn practices worsen the
environment badly. There are countless environmentally unfriendly actions
happening every day, due to globalization.
In
coping with the environmental issue, governments have to intervene to reduce or
restrict polluting activities. Collective effort is made. Many governments have
already signed treaties or agreements. With effectiveness, governments are
capable of helping with the situation, because they possess the authority to
impose laws and the ability to take immediate actions when the situation is
sudden and severe. Unfortunately, this will only take effect if they are
willing to (Chanda, 2007). In other words, it is less likely that governments
prioritize the environment problem. The world now is too competitive, so every
country refuses to lose out to economic rivals. Therefore, governments’
intervention within their own country can be considered. They do not need to
pose the same rules and laws as all the other countries. They can impose regulations
regarding their own countries’ conditions. That governments should work together
does not necessarily mean they should apply exactly the same rules in each
country. The final goal is to better the situation and control the polluting
activities. Hence, governments can make improvement s steadily according to
their current circumstance. It will work better than the time when most of the
governments are more focused on comparing with other countries effort.
Other
than governments, the civilians can make contribution to protect the environment
as well. Many developed countries have made it known that environmental
well-being is a social responsibility. Recycling becomes a way of life in
countries such as Japan, Canada and Switzerland. However, most of these
environmental friendly countries are small in their sizes. For example,
Singapore thinks of ecological measures such as “Bring Your Own Bag Day” and
taxing companies heavily for polluting excessively. All these efforts are
rendered futile when rapid industrial activities persist in China and India.
However, civilians will be more powerful than thought when everybody
works towards the same goal. Governments here can do publicity, promotions
through mass media and public education and introduce programmes, so the public
will further increase their awareness of the importance of the environment.
Gradually, environmental friendly behaviours will become a habit and a
lifestyle. This solution also has its limitations, because in many of the developing
countries, civilians lack the information of environmental problems and
survival itself is a struggle. They are more concerned about the basic needs.
However, their incapability can be overtaken by those who have the information
and the ability, and in long run this solution will have obvious effects.
In
conclusion, the environmental problem lead by globalization has will see the
light if governments intervene effectively and proactively, and civilians do all
they can. The situation is severe, but there is no highway to solve it. With a
bit improvement every moment, gradually and absolutely the problem will be solved
eventually.
References
Petra Christmann and Glen Taylor (2001),Globalization and the Environment: Determinants of Firm Self-Regulation in China. Journal of International Business Studies, Vol. 32, No. 3 pp. 439-458
Nicholas A. Ashford, Barry Bluestone, Phyllis Freeman, J. Davitt McAteer andWilliam R. Moomaw (2002). Globalization and the Environment. Journal of Public Health Policy, Vol. 23, No. 2 pp. 225-238
McConnell, R A (1999). Population, environment, globalization and the survival of civilization. Mankind Quarterly 40.2, 155-178.
Chanda, N. (2007, June 28). Yale Global Online. Retrieved October 8, 2013, from The Double Edge of Globalization
Adil Najam, David Runnalls and Mark Halle, Environment and Globalization: Five Propositions, www.unep.org/gc/gc24/docs/FivePropositions.pdf
(Haven't finished reading all)
References
Petra Christmann and Glen Taylor (2001),Globalization and the Environment: Determinants of Firm Self-Regulation in China. Journal of International Business Studies, Vol. 32, No. 3 pp. 439-458
Nicholas A. Ashford, Barry Bluestone, Phyllis Freeman, J. Davitt McAteer andWilliam R. Moomaw (2002). Globalization and the Environment. Journal of Public Health Policy, Vol. 23, No. 2 pp. 225-238
McConnell, R A (1999). Population, environment, globalization and the survival of civilization. Mankind Quarterly 40.2, 155-178.
Chanda, N. (2007, June 28). Yale Global Online. Retrieved October 8, 2013, from The Double Edge of Globalization
Adil Najam, David Runnalls and Mark Halle, Environment and Globalization: Five Propositions, www.unep.org/gc/gc24/docs/FivePropositions.pdf
(Haven't finished reading all)
No comments:
Post a Comment